By: Milena Krumov
As a linguist with a deep appreciation for the nuances of regional dialects and the cultural tapestry woven by language, I often find myself reflecting on the eloquence of past generations. The rhythmic cadences of early 20th-century American English, infused with both formal propriety and inventive slang, stand in stark contrast to the abbreviated lexicon of today’s youth. The 16–30-year-old age group today, encompassing late Millennials (born 1981–1996) and Generation Z (born 1997–2012), navigates a linguistic landscape dominated by terse digital shorthand—”fire” for exceptional, “cap” for falsehood—terms that prioritize brevity over depth. This perceived decline prompts a poignant question: Has modern culture systematically undermined the expressive richness enjoyed by their equivalents a century ago, the 16–30-year-olds of the 1920s?
Drawing on historical linguistics, empirical data on verbal proficiency, and sociocultural analyses, this essay argues that while language inherently evolves, the confluence of social media, music culture, and broader modern influences has accelerated a shift toward informality, eroding formal speech patterns and interpersonal manners. We will explore the contours of this decline, its precipitating factors, a timeline rooted in the 1970s cultural pivot, and, crucially, whether redemption lies in viewing this as evolution rather than decay.
Historical Foundations: The Linguistic Vitality of 1920s Youth
A century ago, young adults aged 16–30 embodied a linguistic era of exuberant innovation tempered by social decorum. The 1920s, often romanticized as the Jazz Age, saw English slang flourish as a marker of cultural rebellion and sophistication. Terms like “bee’s knees” (denoting excellence) and “cat’s meow” (something stylish) reflected a playful yet precise vernacular that coexisted with formal epistolary traditions and public oratory (Wikipedia, n.d.). This period’s slang, drawn from urban speakeasies, flapper culture, and Prohibition-era underworlds, was regionally inflected—New Yorkers might quip with “baloney” for nonsense, while Midwestern dialects retained agrarian echoes like “flivver” for a cheap automobile (HowStuffWorks, 2024).
Yet, manners in speech were paramount; etiquette manuals emphasized articulate expression as a hallmark of refinement, mirroring the era’s veneration for dress and decorum up through the 1960s (Language Trainers, 2023). In contrast to today’s digital ephemera, communication was deliberate, fostering dialects that preserved phonetic diversity and narrative depth.
Empirical Indicators of Decline: Metrics of Verbal Proficiency
Contemporary evidence underscores a tangible erosion in formal language skills among 16–30-year-olds. Standardized assessments reveal a downward trajectory: Average SAT verbal (now Evidence-Based Reading and Writing) scores, which gauge critical reading and expression, peaked in the mid-1960s at around 543 before plummeting to a nadir of 422 by 1980, with millennial-era averages hovering in the low 500s post-1995 recentering (College Board, 2024; PrepScholar, n.d.). By 2024, the national average SAT score stood at 1024, the lowest since the 2016 redesign, signaling persistent challenges in verbal reasoning (PrepScholar, n.d.). Studies on interpersonal communication further illuminate this gap; the 16–30 age group exhibits reduced face-to-face engagement, preferring asynchronous digital modes 55% of the time compared to 60% for those over 55, correlating with diminished conversational fluency (Tero, n.d.).
Generation Z, forming the younger half of this cohort, fares similarly, with technology-dependent interactions linked to atrophied social and verbal competencies (Forbes, 2024). These metrics, while not capturing slang’s expressive utility, highlight a retreat from the structured eloquence that defined pre-1970s discourse among their 16–30-year-old predecessors.
Precipitating Factors: The Corrosive Trio of Social Media, Music, and Modern Culture
The triad of social media, music culture, and pervasive modern influences has profoundly reshaped the language of 16–30-year-olds, favoring fragmentation over fluency. Social media platforms, ubiquitous since the early 2000s, propel abbreviated syntax and neologisms, eroding grammatical norms among teenagers and young adults (Child Mind Institute, 2025). Exposure to memes and TikTok vernacular introduces enriching vocabularies but truncates sentences, diminishing deep reading and attention spans—effects amplified in children’s and young adults’ writing, where informalisms like emojis supplant nuanced prose (Oxford University Press, 2025; Curry, 2020). This digital osmosis fosters a “dumbification,” where peer validation trumps precision, alienating generational divides (Tero, n.d.).
Music culture exacerbates this, with hip-hop and pop genres disseminating slang that redefines grammar and lexicon for the 16–30 cohort. Lyrics from artists like Eminem embed terms like “stan” (obsessive fan) into mainstream parlance, altering speech patterns and identity formation among youth (ResearchGate, 2025; Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL, 2024). Popular tracks shape social behaviors, embedding casual idioms that prioritize rhythm over rhetoric, a far cry from the balladry of 1920s crooners that influenced their age-group equivalents (SharePro Music Blog, 2023). Broader modern culture, steeped in consumerism and instant gratification, reinforces this informality; casual attire parallels lax manners, eroding the respect for pre-1970s standards.
Timeline of Descent: The 1970s Watershed
The inflection point emerges in the 1970s, aligning with cultural rupture. SAT verbal scores began their precipitous drop in 1964, bottoming out amid the countercultural upheavals of the late 1960s and 1970s, when television and rock music homogenized dialects and diluted formal education (College Board, 2024). This era’s slang—think “groovy” or “far out”—marked an initial liberalization, but escalating media fragmentation from the 1980s onward accelerated the slide. By the time the current 16–30-year-olds (late Millennials and Generation Z) emerged in the 1990s–2000s, digital proliferation cemented the trend, with verbal scores stabilizing at diminished levels (PrepScholar, n.d.). For this cohort, this manifests as a post-1970s vernacular stripped of regional idiosyncrasies, supplanted by globalized memes.
Collateral Damage: The Fading Mosaic of Regional Dialects
My fascination with regional dialects underscores a subtler casualty: homogenization. Early 20th-century America teemed with variants—Southern drawls, Bostonian non-rhoticity—fostered by geographic isolation among 16–30-year-olds of the 1920s (Smithsonian Magazine, 2024). Modern media and migration, however, erode these; urbanization and streaming services broadcast standardized accents, diluting phonetic diversity among today’s youth (Smithsonian Magazine, 2024). Slang like “cap” transcends regions via algorithms, supplanting localized idioms and impoverishing the expressive palette once vibrant in 1920s hometowns.
Collateral Damage: The Fading Mosaic of Regional Dialects
My fascination with regional dialects underscores a subtler casualty: homogenization. Early 20th-century America teemed with variants—Southern drawls, Bostonian non-rhoticity—fostered by geographic isolation among 16–30-year-olds of the 1920s (Smithsonian Magazine, 2024). Modern media and migration, however, erode these; urbanization and streaming services broadcast standardized accents, diluting phonetic diversity among today’s youth (Smithsonian Magazine, 2024). Slang like “cap” transcends regions via algorithms, supplanting localized idioms and impoverishing the expressive palette once vibrant in 1920s hometowns.
Prospects for Renewal: Evolution Over Extinction?
Amid this lament, hope glimmers in linguistics’ core tenet: languages do not decline; they adapt (Tomedes, 2019). Contemporary slang, derided as reductive, enriches semantic fields—”fire” conveys approbation with visceral punch, much as 1920s phrases did for their 16–30-year-old counterparts (OED, n.d.). Low scores reflect curricular emphases on STEM over humanities, not innate deficit; interventions like dialect-preserving curricula could revive manners without stifling innovation (Tomedes, 2019). As Gen X bridges eras, fostering bilingualism in formal and digital registers offers a path forward, honoring the 1960s’ grace while embracing tomorrow’s vernacular.
In sum, the linguistic shift among today’s 16–30-year-olds, though jarring, mirrors historical flux—from Chaucer’s Middle English to Shakespeare’s innovations. Modern culture’s influences warrant scrutiny, yet decrying “dumbification” overlooks resilience. By reclaiming dialects and decorum, we might yet restore language’s profound cultural mantle.
References
Child Mind Institute. (2025, June 16). How using social media affects teenagers. https://childmind.org/article/how-using-social-media-affects-teenagers/
College Board. (2024). Average SAT scores of college-bound seniors (1952–present) [PDF]. https://www.erikthered.com/tutor/historical-average-SAT-scores.pdf
Curry, N. (2020, February 12). How has the English language changed over the past 10 years? Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/elt/blog/2020/02/12/language-evolution-reflecting-language-change-darwin-day/
Forbes. (2024, June 16). Why the social and verbal skills of some Gen Z workers have declined. https://www.forbes.com/sites/edwardsegal/2024/06/16/why-the-social-and-verbal-skills-of-some-gen-z-workers-have-declined/
HowStuffWorks. (2024, August 7). 181 slang words by decade: From ‘scram’ to ‘slaps’. https://people.howstuffworks.com/53-slang-terms-by-decade.htm
Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL. (2024). Exploring slang language in different songs between pop and rap music. https://journal.eltaorganization.org/index.php/joal/article/download/347/247/956
Language Trainers. (2023, June 5). The evolution of English slang. https://www.languagetrainers.ca/blog/evolution-of-english-slang/
OED. (n.d.). The rise and rise of slang. https://www.oed.com/discover/the-rise-and-rise-of-slang/
Oxford University Press. (2025, March 7). Social media drives language change in children’s writing. https://corp.oup.com/news/social-media-drives-language-change-in-childrens-writing/
PrepScholar. (n.d.). Average SAT scores over time: 1972–2024. https://blog.prepscholar.com/average-sat-scores-over-time
ResearchGate. (2025, August 9). The impact of slang from pop songs in modern English language. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382947374_The_Impact_of_Slang_From_Pop_Songs_In_Modern_English_Language_With_Reference_to_Eminem%27s_song_Stan
SharePro Music Blog. (2023, February 20). The impact of hip-hop on language and slang. https://www.sharetopros.com/blog/the-impact-of-hip-hop-on-language-and-slang.php
Shariatmadari, D. (2019, August 15). Why it’s time to stop worrying about the decline of the English language. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2019/aug/15/why-its-time-to-stop-worrying-about-the-decline-of-the-english-language
Smithsonian Magazine. (2024, January 17). A brief history of the United States’ accents and dialects. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/a-brief-history-of-the-united-states-accents-and-dialects-180983591/
Tero. (n.d.). The technological ups and interpersonal downs of the millennial generation. https://www.tero.com/articles/the-technological-ups-and-interpersonal-downs-of-the-millennial-generation.php
Tomedes. (2019, August 21). Is the English language declining or simply evolving? https://www.tomedes.com/translator-hub/English-language-declining-evolving
Wikipedia. (n.d.). Glossary of early twentieth century slang in the United States. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_early_twentieth_century_slang_in_the_United_States
Leave a Reply